The views and opinions posted in this forum are not necessarily those of Jim Wilson, AuctionHints, or any of the employees or associates of AuctionHints.com. Jim Wilson and AuctionHints.com cannot be held accountable for any liabilities that may result from any post.

We invite anyone to email us with any questions: forum@nospam.auctionhints.com

EMAIL ADDRESSES ARE NOW COMPLETELY OPTIONAL!
ENTER YOUR EMAIL ADDY WHEN YOU POST...OR DON'T. IT'S UP TO YOU!

AuctionHintsForum

Re: Attention Jim Cockrum! LINK

Posted By: Robbin K. Tungett
Date: Saturday, 6 May 2006, at 1:40 p.m.

In Response To: Re: Attention Jim Cockrum! (C Scott)

I am surprised. I think it's a great idea to do a search and learn about someone you are going to purchase from. But, you have to remember, no one can make everyone happy - no matter what. You have to weigh the negative against the positive. I am sure that you won't find much more than this thread with negatives about Jim and his eBook. Jim has been around for a long time and has integrity. The fact of the matter is, the scammers, the ones who are dishonest - they don't last long online.... and you can find lots of negatives when someone is really dishonest.

The eBook Jim sells is $29.97... well worth the price if you read it. Plus, he offers a no questions asked money back guarantee. How risky is that? It's sold through clickbank - that in itself guarantees you a refund if you need it. I would venture after reading his ebook, you wouldn't even think of asking for a refund.

Anyway, I just wanted to put my 2 cents in. Remember, researching before purchasing is a good idea, but if you look hard enough, you'll find something negative said about everyone.

I bet if I ask all the people who know you, someone would have something negative to say. That's just the way life is.

Off my soapbox...

Robbin K. Tungett

Auction Riches

Messages In This Thread

Attention Jim Cockrum!
Martin Avis -- Tuesday, 9 March 2004, at 2:49 p.m.

Re: Attention Jim Cockrum!
Karol Gajda -- Tuesday, 9 March 2004, at 3:52 p.m.

Re: Attention Jim Cockrum!
Martin Avis -- Tuesday, 9 March 2004, at 4:01 p.m.

Re: Attention Jim Cockrum! LINK
Bid-Palace -- Thursday, 1 April 2004, at 11:17 p.m.

Re: Attention Jim Cockrum! LINK
James H -- Tuesday, 9 March 2004, at 10:27 p.m.

Re: Attention Jim Cockrum! LINK
Natalie Williams -- Wednesday, 10 March 2004, at 7:29 a.m.

Response from Jim
Jim Cockrum -- Wednesday, 10 March 2004, at 9:49 a.m.

Re: Response from Jim
Martin Avis -- Wednesday, 10 March 2004, at 10:05 a.m.

Re: Response from Jim
Oran -- Monday, 15 March 2004, at 3:19 p.m.

Re: Response from Jim
Natalie Williams -- Monday, 15 March 2004, at 10:26 p.m.

Re: Response from Jim
Oran -- Tuesday, 16 March 2004, at 12:35 a.m.

Re: Response from Jim LINK
Nicholas Shephard -- Wednesday, 31 March 2004, at 12:03 p.m.

Re: Response from Jim
Nicholas Shephard -- Monday, 12 April 2004, at 10:09 p.m.

Clickbank LINK
troy -- Friday, 11 June 2004, at 1:20 p.m.

Re: Attention Jim Cockrum! LINK
Robbin K. Tungett -- Thursday, 1 April 2004, at 10:56 p.m.

Re: Attention Jim Cockrum! LINK
Mehmet Aksoy -- Monday, 5 April 2004, at 9:45 p.m.

Re: Attention Jim Cockrum!
Greg Stocks -- Tuesday, 13 April 2004, at 7:32 p.m.

Re: Attention Jim Cockrum!
Mr T -- Tuesday, 20 April 2004, at 10:06 p.m.

Re: Second Response from Jim Cockrum
Jim Cockrum -- Monday, 19 April 2004, at 8:43 p.m.

Re: Second Response from Jim Cockrum LINK
Barbara Ling -- Tuesday, 20 April 2004, at 6:34 a.m.

Thank you Jim. LINK
Martin Avis -- Tuesday, 20 April 2004, at 8:53 a.m.

Re: Thank you Jim.
Leonard Mullen -- Friday, 23 April 2004, at 12:26 p.m.

Re: Second Response from Jim Cockrum LINK
Nicholas Shephard -- Friday, 21 May 2004, at 4:28 p.m.

You Rock Jim! LINK PIC
Dieter Kling -- Tuesday, 25 May 2004, at 12:07 p.m.

Re: Second Response from Jim Cockrum
joayn123 -- Saturday, 19 March 2005, at 9:36 a.m.

Re: Second Response from Jim Cockrum
Sam -- Wednesday, 10 May 2006, at 11:19 a.m.

Re: Second Response from Jim Cockrum LINK
Gary Hendrickson -- Wednesday, 10 May 2006, at 4:46 p.m.

Re: Second Response from Jim Cockrum LINK
Natalie Williams -- Wednesday, 10 May 2006, at 6:28 p.m.

Re: Second Response from Jim Cockrum LINK
Robbin K. Tungett -- Thursday, 11 May 2006, at 2:17 a.m.

Re: Attention Jim Cockrum!
Troy -- Thursday, 3 June 2004, at 7:26 p.m.

Re: Attention Jim Cockrum! LINK
Natalie Williams -- Thursday, 3 June 2004, at 8:12 p.m.

Re: Attention Jim Cockrum!
Troy -- Thursday, 3 June 2004, at 8:49 p.m.

Silent Sales LINK
Troy -- Thursday, 3 June 2004, at 8:58 p.m.

Re: Silent Sales
Karen -- Friday, 11 June 2004, at 12:07 p.m.

Re: Attention Jim Cockrum!
Margaux DEUS -- Tuesday, 24 August 2004, at 10:46 a.m.

Re: Attention Jim Cockrum!
ronin -- Wednesday, 23 March 2005, at 9:36 p.m.

Re: Attention Jim Cockrum!
Maura -- Sunday, 17 April 2005, at 5:09 p.m.

Re: Attention Jim Cockrum! LINK
Natalie Williams -- Sunday, 17 April 2005, at 11:41 p.m.

Re: Attention Jim Cockrum!
Curious George -- Saturday, 7 May 2005, at 8:28 p.m.

Re: Attention Jim Cockrum!
john doe -- Monday, 23 May 2005, at 6:49 p.m.

Re: Attention Jim Cockrum!
Mary Kate -- Tuesday, 2 May 2006, at 2:42 p.m.

Response from Jim
Jim Cockrum -- Wednesday, 3 May 2006, at 11:23 a.m.

In defense of Jim C LINK PIC
Jim Kaiser -- Wednesday, 3 May 2006, at 1:35 p.m.

Re: Attention Jim Cockrum!
Margaux Deus -- Monday, 13 June 2005, at 5:25 a.m.

Re: Attention Jim Cockrum!
C Scott -- Sunday, 16 April 2006, at 3:06 p.m.

Re: Attention Jim Cockrum! LINK
Jim Wilson -- Sunday, 16 April 2006, at 3:55 p.m.

Re: Attention Jim Cockrum!
james k -- Friday, 5 May 2006, at 6:30 p.m.

Re: Attention Jim Cockrum! LINK
Natalie Williams -- Friday, 5 May 2006, at 7:27 p.m.

Re: Attention Jim Cockrum! LINK
Jim Wilson -- Friday, 5 May 2006, at 9:09 p.m.

Re: Attention Jim Cockrum!
Perry from Phoenix -- Saturday, 6 May 2006, at 11:43 p.m.

Re: Attention Jim Cockrum! LINK
Robbin K. Tungett -- Saturday, 6 May 2006, at 1:40 p.m.

AuctionHintsForum is maintained by AuctionHints Admin with WebBBS 5.12.